Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
6th order designs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buck" data-source="post: 8870273" data-attributes="member: 591582"><p>You could put the rear opening of rear ports closer together if you wanted to get the rear airspace down, they can be decently close together like you have them now (not as slot) due to air coming in from the side and above the port openings, eliminate the rear wall brace, and at your power, I would use jutting braces and not dowels, especially in that rear chamber. Dowels (wooden), in my experience, do tend to come loose over time, so like you could run a jutting brace in between the front subs and extend it back to brace the top and bottom of the rear instead of the dowel. Just small stuff. Idk about your port lengths, you're on your own on that, but it looks pretty damn good to me so far. Nothing is glaringly standing out to me, just I would try to get exactly 5 cubes net rear personally (all disp accounted for, air subs gets to use) but 5.5 might do what you want it too, hard for me to say.</p><p></p><p>That port style makes the entire box much stronger, where the L top piece braces the side and rear walls all the length of the port, so that's 2 birds 1 stone kind of thing, good deal.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buck, post: 8870273, member: 591582"] You could put the rear opening of rear ports closer together if you wanted to get the rear airspace down, they can be decently close together like you have them now (not as slot) due to air coming in from the side and above the port openings, eliminate the rear wall brace, and at your power, I would use jutting braces and not dowels, especially in that rear chamber. Dowels (wooden), in my experience, do tend to come loose over time, so like you could run a jutting brace in between the front subs and extend it back to brace the top and bottom of the rear instead of the dowel. Just small stuff. Idk about your port lengths, you're on your own on that, but it looks pretty damn good to me so far. Nothing is glaringly standing out to me, just I would try to get exactly 5 cubes net rear personally (all disp accounted for, air subs gets to use) but 5.5 might do what you want it too, hard for me to say. That port style makes the entire box much stronger, where the L top piece braces the side and rear walls all the length of the port, so that's 2 birds 1 stone kind of thing, good deal. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
6th order designs
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh