Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
w7= poop...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trancer" data-source="post: 7379611" data-attributes="member: 544448"><p>Please dont ever insult my intelligence again.</p><p></p><p>Since we were getting so technical with our wording here, I figured I would get just as technical as you. I said "I" need rear fill, you said "I" as a driver don't. I meant my application; rear passengers. You simply said less speakers = better sound. Don't try to bash someone by getting technical with your wording, if you cant respond technically back. I knew what you were meaning fyi</p><p></p><p>My point of this entire conversation is that it still amazes me that whens some noob hears the phrase "rear fill," that noob automatically goes, "Noooo! No rear fill! blah blah blah." when said noob doesnt understand, nor does know the application. All this stands from people reading about real fill on the internet and translates it into, OMG Bad. Said "noob" thinks that rear fill is awalys bad and that there are no applications that rear fill is applicable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trancer, post: 7379611, member: 544448"] Please dont ever insult my intelligence again. Since we were getting so technical with our wording here, I figured I would get just as technical as you. I said "I" need rear fill, you said "I" as a driver don't. I meant my application; rear passengers. You simply said less speakers = better sound. Don't try to bash someone by getting technical with your wording, if you cant respond technically back. I knew what you were meaning fyi My point of this entire conversation is that it still amazes me that whens some noob hears the phrase "rear fill," that noob automatically goes, "Noooo! No rear fill! blah blah blah." when said noob doesnt understand, nor does know the application. All this stands from people reading about real fill on the internet and translates it into, OMG Bad. Said "noob" thinks that rear fill is awalys bad and that there are no applications that rear fill is applicable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
w7= poop...
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh