yea it looks like the price on it is going to be too high, so what do you guys think about the other two amps????Thats an older Zapco, if its in good shape it should be a good amp. I wouldn't pay out the a$$ for it though.
i looked on the Crunch website and it sayed 1600 thats why i didnt know //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif i just like the looks of the crunch so much better, but i like the extra power of the hifonics, and im dont know if the crunch is as good as the titan i dont want it to crap out on me or somthing, i still dont know, yea the zapco would be nice but the auction on it is going up too much and there tons of time left so it will probably be too expensive im on a budget here //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gifThe Crunch is rated at 700w @ 1 ohm. They do give it RMS ratings, that seller just decided to only put the dynamic ratings.
Out of the three, I would go with the Zapco. But out of the two, Hifonics...
where,does it say 700w , it shows 1600W@1 0hmThe Crunch is rated at 700w @ 1 ohm. They do give it RMS ratings, that seller just decided to only put the dynamic ratings.
Out of the three, I would go with the Zapco. But out of the two, Hifonics...
I searched google... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gifwhere,does it say 700w , it shows 1600W@1 0hm