Loud3 5,000+ posts Pay me, *****. 4,997 0 Sin City Jan 26, 2009 #16 Listen (or read what...) Squeak has to say. As much as I would love to see more people use Arc... The JL's are the better option.
Listen (or read what...) Squeak has to say. As much as I would love to see more people use Arc... The JL's are the better option.
Brian_smith06 10+ year member I got a pan, I got a plan 4,624 0 Overland Park, KS Jan 26, 2009 #17 Depending on the deal i can get i will either be running those jl hd amps or the id amps. still in the air right now.
Depending on the deal i can get i will either be running those jl hd amps or the id amps. still in the air right now.
OP M magliteman 10+ year member Member 133 0 Somewhere Jan 26, 2009 Thread Starter #18 If I go with option 2, does the sub (IDQ1v3D4) need 500w or should I give it 300w (like the JL 300/2)?
If I go with option 2, does the sub (IDQ1v3D4) need 500w or should I give it 300w (like the JL 300/2)?
Loud3 5,000+ posts Pay me, *****. 4,997 0 Sin City Jan 26, 2009 #19 It's a matter of personal opinion. I prefer to have the extra power available, if nothing else... headroom.
It's a matter of personal opinion. I prefer to have the extra power available, if nothing else... headroom.
S squeak9798 5,000+ posts Banned 26,540 1 USA Jan 26, 2009 #20 I prefer to have the extra power available, if nothing else... headroom. Click to expand... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/word.gif.64b12e39f936af3b4fff38a1c0bd0244.gif
I prefer to have the extra power available, if nothing else... headroom. Click to expand... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/word.gif.64b12e39f936af3b4fff38a1c0bd0244.gif