Speakers aren't 2ohm "stable", amps are. But yes, it seems those speakers have an impedance of 2 ohms, so you would need an amp that puts out about 75w x 4 @ 2ohms. There are plenty of choices out there, it just depends on your budget.arent those speakers 2 ohm stable? then get a 4 channel amp that does about their rms rating at 2 ohms.
your an idiotdennis pwned u! ahaha yea, get a smaller 4 channel and set gains accordingly...
It's "you're", dumbshit. The irony...your an idiot
If YOU'RE (thanks springy101, you're so helpful) only talking about new models...I can get good deal with kicker or Eclipse products.
As already posted by JAZN the word you chose to use was 'your' (which is a possessive indicating ownership of whatever it is describing) rather than "you're" which is a contraction of the two words 'you' and 'are' (the proper usage in this context). Definitely ironic.your an idiot
See the problem, here? Back on up, Skippy. No further assistance will be needed from you here.arent those speakers 2 ohm stable?
It's "you're", dumbshit. The irony...It's "you're", dumbshit. The irony...
If you only talking about new models...
Spec-wise, the kicker zx350.4 looks to match up closest. (90x4@2ohms)
For eclipse, the only thing that comes close is the xa4000, which is far more power than you need.
It all depends if you want to pay for extra power that you probably won't need.
i meant that they are 2 ohm speakers, which they are, i just accidentally used the wrong word. So it wasn't a noobish question, it was me using a word wrong, which has never happened to the almighty prowler who's grammar and spelling is always perfect.As already posted by JAZN the word you chose to use was 'your' (which is a possessive indicating ownership of whatever it is describing) rather than "you're" which is a contraction of the two words 'you' and 'are' (the proper usage in this context). Definitely ironic.
What further irritates me is you calling out someone else as an idiot after asking an incredibly n00bish question about these Infinity speakers being, and I quote,:
See the problem, here? Back on up, Skippy. No further assistance will be needed from you here.
Thanks for correcting me. Good ownage too btw.It's "you're", dumbshit. The irony...
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gifThanks for correcting me. Good ownage too btw.
My apologies to IoNMan1, if there are any other questions please let us know.