Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
How Do I Make My Build Less Peaky 2003 Mustang
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shredder2" data-source="post: 8820863" data-attributes="member: 674047"><p>I see tastes that either lean towards rock or La Banda all the time when I design, when punchiness /w/ extension are what's needed I usually recommend a 4th order. I try to let people know the power handling will be affected sometimes but when designing the tuning, delay and peak can be tailored for the cabin. In a Mustang I'd be leaning towards 2 10's and done right. Mounting depth and space required may affect whether I elect to to a 4th or ported /w/ a 15. Ported would be best tuned Fs (35hz) and in minimum airspace for punchiness/Sq with that driver. Personally if it was mine I'd try for a 4th and tune it 46-48hz done right. Call me crazy but I believe its doable and would slam /w/ that punciness op is after. I like rock myself /w/ the occasional sub-bass (under 25hz) but those low notes /w/ a ton of delay tire me. I like to feel the impact... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shredder2, post: 8820863, member: 674047"] I see tastes that either lean towards rock or La Banda all the time when I design, when punchiness /w/ extension are what's needed I usually recommend a 4th order. I try to let people know the power handling will be affected sometimes but when designing the tuning, delay and peak can be tailored for the cabin. In a Mustang I'd be leaning towards 2 10's and done right. Mounting depth and space required may affect whether I elect to to a 4th or ported /w/ a 15. Ported would be best tuned Fs (35hz) and in minimum airspace for punchiness/Sq with that driver. Personally if it was mine I'd try for a 4th and tune it 46-48hz done right. Call me crazy but I believe its doable and would slam /w/ that punciness op is after. I like rock myself /w/ the occasional sub-bass (under 25hz) but those low notes /w/ a ton of delay tire me. I like to feel the impact... :cool: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
How Do I Make My Build Less Peaky 2003 Mustang
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh