AQ 2200D tested!

[Anonymous 10+ year member]

can you get results with the amp @ a 1 ohm reactive load?

 

[dbhittin 5,000+ posts]

anyone got pics of this amp too? lol

 

[Goindef154 5,000+ posts]

Thanks for doing the testing man, debating on whether getting a 1200D or getting the 2200D. Not really a money problem, just didn't want to spend that much.

1/0 input terminals. I think every amp over 500 watts should have them.

Preaching to the quire! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 

[SeanDub 10+ year member]

Thanks for doing the testing man, debating on whether getting a 1200D or getting the 2200D. Not really a money problem, just didn't want to spend that much.


Preaching to the quire! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

Lol.

But yes I also appreciate this thread, the testing, and the information on real power versus apparent power. That stuff was a good read the other day.

 

[LDW3RD 10+ year member]

Very good tech info here guys. Thanks

Good work to the OP..

 

[Anonymous 10+ year member]

Yes very good work and very nice results.

 

[Anonymous 10+ year member]

Have not been able to get a 1 ohm reactive load? I am sure it will do at least rated based on what it does at 4 ohm and 2 ohm.

 

[IgnoreMe 5,000+ posts]

J25: hey i was just looking over this thread again and i thought back to your HDC thread about the testing you did. didnt you do a 143+ with 1 hdc and 1 DD m1a? and in this thread you're pulling a 143+ with the Aq 2200d.

isnt the m1a a 1200w amp?

 

[SPL140.2 5,000+ posts]

J25: hey i was just looking over this thread again and i thought back to your HDC thread about the testing you did. didnt you do a 143+ with 1 hdc and 1 DD m1a? and in this thread you're pulling a 143+ with the Aq 2200d.
isnt the m1a a 1200w amp?

maybe different boxes??

 

[IgnoreMe 5,000+ posts]

i think its the same box (he says its the same box from the 1200d tests, but i dont know if thats the same box he did for the "hdc" tests), however i just noticed he is using an HD and not the HDC this time around. i remember his HDC pretty much killed his old HD so that could be why.

 

[ultimate157 5,000+ posts]

I never saw mention of a scope in your tests. Did you ever put a scope on the outputs ?

 

[Jeremiah25 10+ year member]

i think its the same box (he says its the same box from the 1200d tests, but i dont know if thats the same box he did for the "hdc" tests), however i just noticed he is using an HD and not the HDC this time around. i remember his HDC pretty much killed his old HD so that could be why.

Yeah, it did almost a 146 with the HD3c. Look at part 2 of the test. Another thing to consider is my windshield is pretty severly busted now, and wasn't before. I busted it breaking ice off of it this winter. I haven't referenced the car with the busted windshield against what it used to do before it was busted. It may have lost a little.

 

[DBDRAGGUY 10+ year member]

Wanted to add my finding from today.

I tested the pair strapped to my DD 9515's in 10.5 cubes @ 40hz.

Test Frequency 43 hz

Resting load 0.6 ohms

Resting voltage 14.38 volts

Voltage dropped to 13.2 volts at burp

72.4 volts

47.2 amps

3417 watts @1.53 ohms.

This is just an example of the aparent power a pair of these are producing in my application. These numbers will change dependent are your subs, box and feed voltage. Also the pair strapped is rated to be stable at 2ohms.

 

[mobeious 10+ year member]

so 3417 watts at 1.53ohm and its suppost to do 4400@2ohm

 

[TheFiverMan 10+ year member]

so 3417 watts at 1.53ohm and its suppost to do 4400@2ohm

lol thats what i thought..