jco1385 5,000+ posts
expert jcologist
thats fckin nutshttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/27/the-volvette-tt-ls1-powered-740-wagon///content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif
thats fckin nutshttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/27/the-volvette-tt-ls1-powered-740-wagon///content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif
too bad that 740 doesn't have more weight or rubber or both in the back...bad@$$http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/27/the-volvette-tt-ls1-powered-740-wagon///content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif
you've got to be fucking shitting meI have some 24's im putting on it this weekend. Some people dont like it but its not their car.
whatever you have to tell yourself.how does it feel to be so insignificant? and know that scum like me is 3+ levels above you, or anything you will ever achieve?
loserI have some 24's im putting on it this weekend. Some people dont like it but its not their car.
did you notice that it's supercharged? i think the idea was to have a good power curve and be very daily driveable, not to cram teh biggest thing that would fit in there. it's not always about the largest engine or the most HP, driveability matters a lot to most people as does teh ease of the swap.No offense but if someone were to go through the hastle of dropping a v8 in there they should have put in something a bit bigger maybe a built 350. Im sure it would have been a tighter fit but with all the work already done it shouldnt have made a huge difference
Thank you kind sir!//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/veryhappy.gif.fec4fed33b4a1279cf10bdd45a039dae.gifdid you notice that it's supercharged? i think the idea was to have a good power curve and be very daily driveable, not to cram teh biggest thing that would fit in there. it's not always about the largest engine or the most HP, driveability matters a lot to most people as does teh ease of the swap.