mk jackasses i'm gone now, go on pretending that you're 8's perform better than 15's and 18's of the same make....
i'll be in the real world, realizing that no company makes a line where the bigger subs have less potential than the smaller subs...
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
there are 262 posts before this one i have quoted, and somehow, you still dont get it that
WE ARENT TALKING ABOUT ANY SPECIFIC COMPANIES, LINES OF PRODUCT, OR SPECIFIC WOOFERS...
what we are talking about is concrete facts, and woofer design, which i am most confident in saying you dont have a clue about that either.
sure, you can generalize that
most of the time within a certain companies line of woofers the 15" is going to be louder and play lower than a 12", a 10", or an 8" of the same companies same line of product. and at the same time you can generalize that the smaller woofers are going to work in smaller boxes, work off of less power, and have a lower Qts. i mean hell, if they designed them all to have the exact same specs, lets face it, everyone would just make one size of woofer and be done with it. but they dont, because that would not be an ideal business model.
no one is arguing this with you cotjones. but you arent smart enough to understand this.
what we are saying (and again, you arent smart enough to understand it) is that you
cannot say that a larger cone size is going to play lower, louder. this, again, is a generalization, and not a fact.
go back to the OP, read it again and tell me where he has specified which woofers he is comparing. go ahead, ill give you a few minutes
whats that? he doesnt specify? well, how can we give him a fact based answer if we dont have any facts to compare????? wait, we do have one fact, a 15" has more surface area than a 12"... /discussion, there is no other correct answer.