BigBassMan, I don't understand the Octave stuff. So, approximately what frequency are you saying that my sub will reach it's longest excursion above tunning?my pee pee is bigger than dustins..
I win by default? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif
and yes.. a woofers excursion will be lowest, at, and just above the tuning frequency of the port.. however.. due to back emf, there will be an increase of excursion up to around one half to 3/4 octave above tuning.. the woofer will have the most excursion above tuning at that point..
and of course.. below tuning excursion increases until something breaks.. usually 1 octave or more below tuning frequency..
Loyd L.
That's nice how you broke it down, but what are you trying to tell me?Math Class Time:
Alright 28 mm / 10 cm= 2.8 cm/2.54in=1.10236in of x-max
Dumb ass. that's all i have to say...That's nice how you broke it down, but what are you trying to tell me?
Yes, I knew that b4 you posted. I have the t/s sheet right beside me.
That is only HALF of my sub's xmax. 28mm is ONE WAY. So again, it could be moving twice what it is.
I don't know exactly what your goals are, but more excursion equaling more output is really only true for the same enclosure. I can build a ported enclosure and a sealed enclosure for the same sub. Feeding them both the same power the ported will be louder from around 30-50 hz. This is without using a huge box or a high tuning trying to extract extra SPL from the ported box. Basically a SQ alignment. The excursion on the ported setup will be minimal around tuning. Feed the setup enough power to get the sealed system to reach its mechanical limits and the ported setup will still be louder and have less excursion. Just cause the sub has a ton of excursion doesn't mean you need or even want to use it all. If you are trying to listen to music the sub is more linear (read as accurate) in the middle of it suspension travel than at the ends. Just like having more power than you need is a good thing and bigger wire than you need is a good thing, more suspension travel than you need is a good thing.Given my circumstances, I believe that the sealed enclosure will give equal output. Twice the excursion will equal the sub at half the xcursion + the vent in my opinion.
PLUS, It will be easier on my amplifier and my electrical system because there is NO WAY I'll need the same 1500wrms in the proper sealed box to reach full xcursion. MAYBE 1000wrms, maybe.
FU(K You B1T(H. There is always someone to belittle another just bcuz he doesn't know as much. Why in the FU(K do you think I'm asking questions? Stupid A$$.Dumb ass. that's all i have to say...
oh, i'll add...the subs excursion is SUPPOSED to be minimal near tuning. Your SSF is supposed to be set lowr...1/2 octave lower like stated. ALSO, do you sit turned around all the time...just so u can watch the excursion while you are driving?? WTF...AND xmax is a number...and one way?? what's ur point?? Seriously...u need to educate urself...go join the 30 Below DUMB club. peace
NG
Thanx man.I don't know exactly what your goals are, but more excursion equaling more output is really only true for the same enclosure. I can build a ported enclosure and a sealed enclosure for the same sub. Feeding them both the same power the ported will be louder from around 30-50 hz. This is without using a huge box or a high tuning trying to extract extra SPL from the ported box. Basically a SQ alignment. The excursion on the ported setup will be minimal around tuning. Feed the setup enough power to get the sealed system to reach its mechanical limits and the ported setup will still be louder and have less excursion. Just cause the sub has a ton of excursion doesn't mean you need or even want to use it all. If you are trying to listen to music the sub is more linear (read as accurate) in the middle of it suspension travel than at the ends. Just like having more power than you need is a good thing and bigger wire than you need is a good thing, more suspension travel than you need is a good thing.
You talk BIG stuff over the computer. I bet your only 5 feet tall, with no hairline. Oops, my bad, that's your mother.Dumb ass. that's all i have to say...
oh, i'll add...the subs excursion is SUPPOSED to be minimal near tuning. Your SSF is supposed to be set lowr...1/2 octave lower like stated. ALSO, do you sit turned around all the time...just so u can watch the excursion while you are driving?? WTF...AND xmax is a number...and one way?? what's ur point?? Seriously...u need to educate urself...go join the 30 Below DUMB club. peace
NG
You talk BIG stuff over the computer. I bet your only 5 feet tall, with no hairline. Oops, my bad, that's your mother.
I'm curious. Do you think it would've come to this if you would have kept your opinion of my car audio intelligence to yourself? Don't think soYour the one talking **** over the net....contradicting asshat...go ahead, break my back, cuz you know what Im interested to see you try you numb skull. o0oo0 talking about peoples mothers...thats ****ing old idiot. So stop your fvuckin *****ing.
Interesting you should say that. How exactly did he help me? By what... calling me a dumbass?Ok you got your help, stop while you are ahead. More people you piss off, the less will want to help you out. Just remember, nobody here has to help you.